http://www.vectorvest.com/
VectorVest Market Timing and Stock Analysis Software.
VN:F [1.9.11_1134]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
VectorVest, 5.0 out of 5 based on 1 rating
Enjoying the VectorVest information? Sign up for the newsletter today and access even more top quality trading related content! Learn More
By William Schraeder
On 11-18-2009 at 2:43 pm
Don’t waste your money; more importantly, even if you have money to burn, don’t waste your time.
When we first purchased VectorVest six months ago and began a thorough and systematic evaluation of the product, we initially believed that we could profit by taking the opposite side of the VectorVest recommendation, as our tests indicated that VectorVest’s marketing timing calls and stock ratings were wrong about 87% of the time. In other words, it appeared that VectorVest was just a parrot for what Wall Street recommends, and anyone that has traded for awhile knows that when Wall Street says buy, that means sell, and when they say sell, that means buy. Unfortunately, after a thorough analysis, we realized that all testing using the VectorVest system is invalid because the system contains bad math and bad data. Specifically, VectorVest does not properly account for stock splits, includes numerous bad prints in its data. In addition, the mathematical calculations used in the system have numerous errors.
In terms of product quality, VectorVest is severely lacking. In addition to the bad data and mathematical errors mentioned above, the program frequently crashes, has frequent “divide by zero” errors, and sometimes will simply not retrieve results. As programmers, we were able to definitively determine that all of these problems were due to poor programming practices, poor quality assurance testing, and most importantly, an arrogant attitude on the part of the support staff and a refusal by them to fix the problems. We are confident the reason for this is they sell so many copies of this flawed product that frankly, they don’t care. Moreover, they DO NOT offer refunds, so if you purchase anything other than the basic monthly data, which you can cancel but not receive a pro-rated refund on, you get no refund. In other words, they know the software has problems, therefore, they do not offer refunds.
The bottom line is after over six months of thorough and careful analysis, we conclude that regardless of whether you follow the system or take the opposite side of the trade, your results cannot be reliably predicted simply because the data the VectorVest system relies on is inaccurate. At the end of the day, any serious analysis using their product is analogous to throwing darts at the Wall Street Journal stock tables. Between failure to account for stock splits, bad prints, and a multitude of programming errors within the system, most simulations you run are statistically unreliable because the data in the VectorVest system is inaccurate. Moreover, locating and/or attempting to filter out the bad data in the VectorVest system is excruciatingly painful because the program frequently encounters “divide by zero” errors or simply crashes. You have to have a tremendous amount of patience and a cabinet full of pain killers to use the VectorVest system for more than a few days.
Don’t waste your money or your time.
By Chris
On 3-5-2010 at 8:44 am
Funny, I’ve had the exact opposite experience with VV. I followed their methodology and now find myself up about 40% over the course of the last 4 months.
Why would you buy a system, and then do the exact opposite? lol
By Alfred
On 9-6-2011 at 11:38 pm
How good is the VV system? I don’t know. The first time when I run the 5-week trial subscription (using stock-viewer on HKG stocks), I found the difference in market capital/#of shares between what reported in VV system vs what actually are for some HKG stocks were very substantial. The #2 largest market capital stock in HKG (0939.HK) being ranked as #37 (there was a 10 times difference, HKD126.7B in VV vs HKD1267B actual). Seven out of the 46 stocks that compose the Hang Seng Index have their market capital wrong in VV.
I would suggest VV to follow up very seriously with the data supplier on data integrity and may also want to do some QA on data being fed. Things like EPS, P/E are calculated based on #of shares. If VV’s suggestions are based on wrong data input, some good money may go down the drain by taking up the suggestions. By the way, at least one stock listed since Jun2011 is not in VV system (0871.HK).
I HAVE INFORMED VV ON THE PROBLEMS (THRU PHONE CALLS/EMAILS TO SUPPORT , SALES, DATA MANAGER )SINCE 11AUG2011, THERE WAS NO RESPONSE ON WHAT HAPPENED AND WHAT VV WILL DO TO CLEAN UP THEIR DATA BASE.
I am totally disappointed.
Like or Dislike: