<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bucket Shop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.traderslog.com/bucket-shop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.traderslog.com/bucket-shop/</link>
	<description>Online Trading Community for Stocks Futures and Forex Traders</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 07:21:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.traderslog.com/bucket-shop/comment-page-1/#comment-3190</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qs2506.traderslog.com/2009/09/28/bucket-shop/#comment-3190</guid>
		<description>Interviews by Morley Safer with Madoff family show just how easy it is for brokers (under the guise of legitimacy) to operate such a firm under the pretense of legitimacy without really being legitimate.

Bucket shop definitions support that illegal component within the securities industry since the production of false financial statements for customers is relatively easy, and without more, there is no reason to believe that any brokerage operation is legitimate, especially when securities are unauthenticated, commonly held in &quot;street name,&quot; and do not carry any sort of identifying data for identification and verification purposes. 

Why should any firms under such circumstances be considered legitimate rather than simply security scams?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interviews by Morley Safer with Madoff family show just how easy it is for brokers (under the guise of legitimacy) to operate such a firm under the pretense of legitimacy without really being legitimate.</p>
<p>Bucket shop definitions support that illegal component within the securities industry since the production of false financial statements for customers is relatively easy, and without more, there is no reason to believe that any brokerage operation is legitimate, especially when securities are unauthenticated, commonly held in &#8220;street name,&#8221; and do not carry any sort of identifying data for identification and verification purposes. </p>
<p>Why should any firms under such circumstances be considered legitimate rather than simply security scams?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

